DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIC
Docket No. NR5471-14
9 Dec 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
deceased husband's naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
_ 8 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5
dated 23 October 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR5471-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 dtd 23 Oct 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5408 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014.. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10462 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considerea the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 6 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5450 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5450-14 on of an official Consequently, when applying for a correcti to demonstrate the naval record, the burden is on the applicant existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5592 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 12 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5588 14
Additionally, the Board considered your response dated 20 Nov 2014. , However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3861 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1972 14
ree WRTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR SORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORBS 701 §. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. -Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official s on the applicant to demonstrate the naval record, the burden 1 existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2656 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 26 June 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8308 14
However, you allege that you did not receive a copy of the partially favorable advisory opinion (2/0), since you did not agree with the approval dates. As explained in the Board’s previous partial approval letter, a case may only be reconsidered upon submission of new and material evidence. On 14 July 2014, your reconsideration request was approved.